Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dominus Arbitrationis"

From Arcen Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Thank you for offering sysop rights: Forgot to mention indenting)
(→‎AI War talk page: new section)
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
::Cheers.  [[User:Zespri|Zespri]] ([[User talk:Zespri|talk]]) 20:55, 3 March 2015 (CST)
 
::Cheers.  [[User:Zespri|Zespri]] ([[User talk:Zespri|talk]]) 20:55, 3 March 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
== AI War talk page ==
 +
 +
Do we have any sort of overall talk page for AI war? (Or any of these groups, come to think of it) [[User:Sk 2013|Sk 2013]] ([[User talk:Sk 2013|talk]]) 08:47, 9 March 2015 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:47, 9 March 2015

If you wish to bring something to my attention/ask me something, feel free to either post here or send me an email

Adding a table

I'm trying to update the page for the AI War protector starship, and I notice that the tables used are embedded, not hard-coded, and wish to continue following convention. Can you explain or direct me to a guide on how to add a table that I can then reference in the page?

Thanks

Sk 2013 (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2015 (CST)

Looking at it, the only reason I can see for transcluding (That's the actual term for it :) )the tables is they are pretty long and ugly to see code-wise. If you want you can just hard-code it in since it is really simple to move to a separate page page. For the explanation on how to do it according to existing convention, here you go:
  • Make a new convention.
Seriously, we don't have a good looking convention on for it, and I'm more than willing to update it and move stuff as needed. ~ Ad intellige (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2015 (CST)

Updating the navigation templates

Looking at the Template:AIWarShips, I notice sporadic cases of assigning AI: War ships to the AI War category, but no overall pattern. (It's creating a lot of dead links in the process.) Do we want to try to migrate the whole thing over to the AI War: namespace, should I use redirects on the default pages, or should I bring the pages in the AI War namespace back to their original locations? Sk 2013 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2015 (CST)

Every page should be in the proper namespace. I would prefer no redirects, but it would probably be best to leave the redirects just in case there are hard links there. ~ Ad intellige (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2015 (CST)

Thank you for offering sysop rights

I don't mind if this is not too much trouble, however I cannot promise or guarantee anything about my future contributions. If this sysop thingies comes with any sort of expectation, then I'll pass. (And to be honest, it's pretty difficult to answer if I want "a few new buttons that might make it faster, might not" without actually knowing what it is). In any case, I appreciate you asking. {{#define:date|02:00, 2 March 2015‎|if=02:00, 2 March 2015‎}}— Unsigned comment by Zespri (talkcontribs)

The only expectation with it is that you don't abuse it in any way. Other than that, nope! And its literally a couple mouse clicks and typing your name in. The main rights I can think of you getting are the ability to delete pages, block users, bypass a few kinda annoying limits (I don't think we actually have any like that, actually), and add give other people various rights. I'll go ahead and add you as one, since you can actually undo me and remove the rights from yourself as a form of resignation.
Also, we should try to keep topics together (So replying to the post on your talk page rather than here (Just continue replying here though, this is just for future reference)), and make sure to sign your talk page posts with four tildes ( ~~~~ )! ~ Ad intellige (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2015 (CST)
Cheers. Zespri (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2015 (CST)

AI War talk page

Do we have any sort of overall talk page for AI war? (Or any of these groups, come to think of it) Sk 2013 (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2015 (CDT)