Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dominus Arbitrationis"
(→Updating the navigation templates: Reply) |
(→Thank you for offering sysop rights: new section) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:Every page should be in the proper namespace. I would prefer no redirects, but it would probably be best to leave the redirects just in case there are hard links there. ~ [[User:Dominus Arbitrationis|<span style="color:crimson; font-size:140%; font-family:Script, serif">Ad intellige</span>]] [[User_talk:Dominus Arbitrationis|<sup style="font-size:70%; color: gold">(talk)</sup>]] 23:11, 13 February 2015 (CST) | :Every page should be in the proper namespace. I would prefer no redirects, but it would probably be best to leave the redirects just in case there are hard links there. ~ [[User:Dominus Arbitrationis|<span style="color:crimson; font-size:140%; font-family:Script, serif">Ad intellige</span>]] [[User_talk:Dominus Arbitrationis|<sup style="font-size:70%; color: gold">(talk)</sup>]] 23:11, 13 February 2015 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Thank you for offering sysop rights == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I don't mind if this is not too much trouble, however I cannot promise or guarantee anything about my future contributions. If this sysop thingies comes with any sort of expectation, then I'll pass. (And to be honest, it's pretty difficult to answer if I want "a few new buttons that might make it faster, might not" without actually knowing what it is). In any case, I appreciate you asking. |
Revision as of 02:00, 2 March 2015
If you wish to bring something to my attention/ask me something, feel free to either post here or send me an email |
Adding a table
I'm trying to update the page for the AI War protector starship, and I notice that the tables used are embedded, not hard-coded, and wish to continue following convention. Can you explain or direct me to a guide on how to add a table that I can then reference in the page?
Thanks
Sk 2013 (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2015 (CST)
- Looking at it, the only reason I can see for transcluding (That's the actual term for it :) )the tables is they are pretty long and ugly to see code-wise. If you want you can just hard-code it in since it is really simple to move to a separate page page. For the explanation on how to do it according to existing convention, here you go:
- Make a new convention.
- Seriously, we don't have a good looking convention on for it, and I'm more than willing to update it and move stuff as needed. ~ Ad intellige (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2015 (CST)
Looking at the Template:AIWarShips, I notice sporadic cases of assigning AI: War ships to the AI War category, but no overall pattern. (It's creating a lot of dead links in the process.) Do we want to try to migrate the whole thing over to the AI War: namespace, should I use redirects on the default pages, or should I bring the pages in the AI War namespace back to their original locations? Sk 2013 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2015 (CST)
- Every page should be in the proper namespace. I would prefer no redirects, but it would probably be best to leave the redirects just in case there are hard links there. ~ Ad intellige (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2015 (CST)
Thank you for offering sysop rights
I don't mind if this is not too much trouble, however I cannot promise or guarantee anything about my future contributions. If this sysop thingies comes with any sort of expectation, then I'll pass. (And to be honest, it's pretty difficult to answer if I want "a few new buttons that might make it faster, might not" without actually knowing what it is). In any case, I appreciate you asking.