Difference between revisions of "AI War talk:Warp Counter Attack Guard Post"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Not sure how CPA react to warp jammer coms. --~~~~') |
(→4043: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not sure how CPA react to warp jammer coms. --[[User:WinterBorn|WinterBorn]] 21:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC) | Not sure how CPA react to warp jammer coms. --[[User:WinterBorn|WinterBorn]] 21:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 4043 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rather than having Counterattack Guard Posts die (and launch a counterattack wave) when the command station on their planet is now killed, instead they now provide protection to their command station until they are killed. Thus the same net effect is in place for players -- players can't kill the command station without also killing the counterattack guard post -- but it is no longer possible for players to ACCIDENTALLY trigger the counterattack guard post, which is a big improvement. | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 2 December 2010
Not sure how CPA react to warp jammer coms. --WinterBorn 21:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
4043
Rather than having Counterattack Guard Posts die (and launch a counterattack wave) when the command station on their planet is now killed, instead they now provide protection to their command station until they are killed. Thus the same net effect is in place for players -- players can't kill the command station without also killing the counterattack guard post -- but it is no longer possible for players to ACCIDENTALLY trigger the counterattack guard post, which is a big improvement.
