Difference between revisions of "AI War talk:OLD Golems"
m (Pumpkin moved page AI War talk:Golems to AI War talk:OLD Golems) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
IMO, it doesn't feel that out of date. However, the [[AI War:Minor Factions|Minor Factions]] page says the same but shorter. Which is best? Deleting the page talking only about golems, or replacing the chapter about golems in the Minor Factions page by a link to the golems page? [[User:Pumpkin|Pumpkin]] ([[User talk:Pumpkin|talk]]) 14:22, 11 March 2015 (CDT) | IMO, it doesn't feel that out of date. However, the [[AI War:Minor Factions|Minor Factions]] page says the same but shorter. Which is best? Deleting the page talking only about golems, or replacing the chapter about golems in the Minor Factions page by a link to the golems page? [[User:Pumpkin|Pumpkin]] ([[User talk:Pumpkin|talk]]) 14:22, 11 March 2015 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm completely in favor of deleting outdated pages like this one after updated pages are created. --[[User:Imago|Imago]] ([[User talk:Imago|talk]]) 20:01, 20 May 2015 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 9 July 2016
need to check other AI WarpGate=Full structures to see if they fufill the "warp gate proximity" requirement
warpgateAI (exo-wormholes) may also work meaning that golems will work on a players homeplanet against the backdoor hacker AI--WinterBorn 16:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
not sure if the Zenith trader offerings have changed since 3.0--WinterBorn 16:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Black widow golem has a lot of health now - descripton of needing support is probably outdated
Defeating the mining golem is probably far different now as it has an ultra-heavy hull and some ships get large bonuses abainst that hull type--WinterBorn 00:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
It may be best to fold this into the minor factions page, given how out of date it is... thoughts, anyone?Sk 2013 (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2015 (CST)
IMO, it doesn't feel that out of date. However, the Minor Factions page says the same but shorter. Which is best? Deleting the page talking only about golems, or replacing the chapter about golems in the Minor Factions page by a link to the golems page? Pumpkin (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2015 (CDT)
I'm completely in favor of deleting outdated pages like this one after updated pages are created. --Imago (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2015 (CDT)
